Earl Disappoints … ‘Sporting Goods’: No Way …. Clinton’s NAFTA Blunder
Posted by James Israel | Posted in Uncategorized | Posted on 16-09-2010
0
By Jim Israel [‘Mr. Gripes’] September 13, 2010
Damn it, Earl, Huff and Puff – Let’s first deliver one unassailable assertion: any of the big shots running the national television networks would gladly donate their respective left testicles to Sloan-Kettering Hospital if they were assured that Hurricane Earl would veer suddenly in a due-West direction, with the storm subsequently smashing full-blast into Cape Hatteras. That would have made the month of every network major domo.
An exaggeration – perhaps – but the breathless coverage preceding Earl’s meandering swing up the East Coast was hyperbolic, to say the least. Readers, you can’t count the number of times we viewers were shown shots of correspondents, flung out from Hog’s Head to Seabright to Cape Cod, speaking in ominous, foreboding tones, incessantly warning us that the hurricane was on the verge of crushing the East Coast to smithereens; in the background, meanwhile, there were nothing but gentle waves, kissed by soft, warm winds, under a cloudless cobalt sky, with lovely girls basking on the beach.
It sure as Hell didn’t seem be a catastrophic event, more like a lovely summer day on Antigua.
When the hurricane did finally arrive at the mainland, the gloom among the networks was palpable. Yes, we heard repeatedly that shore residents were ‘bracing’ for the storm, [no other verb is ever used around an impending storm -- always ‘bracing for.’]. With the perennial shots of windows being boarded up, and ships being removed from marina slips, Mr. Gripes wouldn’t be surprised if, in the interest of saving money, TV stations now trot out some old stock footage they’ve stored away after previous storms.
In any event, Matt Lauer of NBC’s The Today Show simply could not conceal his huge disappointment the morning Earl came in. In his heart, as sugar plum fantasies of sky-high ratings swirled about, Mr. Lauer hoped for some damage at least –maybe water cascading over highways, downed telephone lines or, best of all, a beach house, barely attached to its moorings, slowing sinking into the ocean.
Mr. Lauer thinks to himself, ‘All I need are a few great visuals. Katrina will be nothing but a summer squall once I get through with Earl.’ No, Matt may never want another Katrina, but just enough destruction to allow NBC to make mincemeat of those punks over at Good Morning America once again.
So, what to do? Al Roker is sent down to the North Carolina Outer Banks as the hurricane came ashore. Clad in a formidable, full-length raincoat that must have been borrowed from a Deadliest Catch crew member, standing in surf of one-foot waves, Mr. Roker leans into the wind. To a casual viewer, it would appear to be surely a Category-5, 150-miles-an-hour ‘lean.’ [Later, Mr. Gripes looks up the wind velocity: Oh boy, 36 miles an hour.]
Mr. Roker is shrieking now, as if we cannot hear him over the sound of the whimpering wind. It’s a performance that could garner an Oscar for the big man next April. Mr. Lauer, disregarding the Nicholson-caliber acting, picks up a phone and breaks the depressing news to the head honchos up in New York: ‘We unfortunately dodged a bullet. It could have been much worse. You bastard, Earl, you let us down big time.’
‘Sporting Goods?’ – Mr. Gripes wasn’t asking for much when he entered a Sports Authority emporium in Manhattan last month: just a simple pair of swimming goggles. Is that really too much to ask? [Mr. Gripes swims laps a couple of times a week: alas, he’s far from Michael Phelps; as a friend of his puts it, the Gripes Australian crawl, sadly, evokes an image of a “refrigerator with arms.”] I might as well have been looking for Asama bin Laden.
Once upon a time, if one were to enter a sporting goods operation, the merchandise was exclusively athletic equipment – baseball mitts, golf clubs, hockey sticks, every sport with hundreds of articles to choose from, and nothing else. Nowadays, though, customers are confronted with acres and acres of clothing, next to stacks and stacks of shoes. All, sure, the sales personnel are certain to say the clothing is all related to ‘running gear.’ Bull crap. It’s all about high-priced fashion these days.
They’d much rather sell you a Nike ‘tech’ T-shirt at 35 bucks a pop, manufactured for 45 cents in Bangladesh. A 34-inch Josh Hamilton model baseball bat, crafted on a lathe in the grand, old USA incidentally, has a much lower mark-up.
But, Mr. Gripes can be very persistent at times. He needs those goggles, and damn it, he’s going to find them. Just as he, quite inebriated, stumbled through a huge Missouri cornfield decades ago, Mr. Gripes slowly wends his way through about 50 hectares of track suits, thousands of matching outfits each uglier than the next, priced at $198 per. Mr. Gripes figures at that price these garments must have been spun out of pure gold leaf. [By the way, you can bet your underwater mortgage that no regular runner doing his miles would be caught dead clad in one of those monstrosities.]
Finally, after an agonizing 15 minutes being jerked from one end of the store to another, I did locate a lonely pair of swim goggles. Not before, of course, thrashing through row upon row of $85 swim trunks. What a journey. Mr. Gripes instantly felt a kinship with the Spanish explorer Cortes; Mr. Cortes’ elation at finding all that Aztec gold in Mexico City could not possibly have surpassed the giddiness felt by Mr. Gripes grasping those goggles at last.
NAFTA – During a pleasure trip through the South a few weeks ago, I observed, quite frequently, large, empty buildings along the highways. Uncomprehending at first, it did finally occur to me: these are the carcasses of what were not long ago thriving factories that provided thousands of jobs for surrounding communities. Now? Nothing but hulking edifices resembling the empty stalag prisoner barracks in Russia’s Siberia. North and South Carolina, and Georgia, too, were 20 years ago the epicenter of the textile and furniture industry in this country.
NAFTA precipitated this disaster. NAFTA – the North American Free Trade Agreement – accelerated the eventual loss of millions of American jobs to countries around the world. Bill Clinton has blood on his hands — he completely blew it. It pains Mr. Gripes to admit this, as he was a supporter of NAFTA, but he was snookered, like many of us, by President Clinton, who touted NAFTA as the answer for American economic woes.
It would open up world trade, not only lowering pricing for many consumer products [It did do that], but create many new international markets for American goods. That was the first grievous calculation. What followed after the NAFTA legislation passed was the worst of all possible scenarios: lower tariffs probably did open up more markets for American goods, but American product simply could not compete with other countries. Domestic costs made that impossible. And, because labor costs overseas were a fraction of what was paid the American worker, many jobs left the country.
Cheaper goods, too, meant that America, caught in a paroxysm of spending far beyond its means, would import more goods, and amass huge trade deficits, which over time will eviscerate a nation’s treasury. Lost jobs and an accelerating debt: that’s NAFTA’s legacy. From the moment that legislation passed, those middle-class factory employees never had a chance – they were done for. Bill Clinton pulled a fast one: for the promise of a pair of $20 jeans, millions of American workers were essentially eliminated.
I’m embarrassed that I did not notice this phenomenon before. It took seeing those empty factories for the reality to emerge. That’s not unusual, though. Americans are simply not told the truth about so many things going on now. Or, just as likely, we’re in a state of denial, considering everything’s that’s occurred in the last few years.
I wonder: if we’re to take Mr. Clinton at his word, that he was certain NAFTA and the promise of open trade all over the globe were the best option for America, how could he and his economic advisors have erred so tragically in assessing the consequences of NAFTA? Jobs will, after all, always migrate to countries with far cheaper labor costs. That’s a fundamental law of economics. And, our own goods, on a cost-basis, simply could not and do not compete with goods manufactured overseas. That’s another given. Was Mr. Clinton that stupid?
To put it succinctly, of course not. Here’s my calculus: immense multi-national corporations surely foresaw that much diminished labor costs emanating out of NAFTA would translate into much greater profits for their own all-over-the-world businesses. So, they pushed very hard for NAFTA. Those corporations are not naïve. They knew that the $19-an-hour American factory worker would very soon be extinct, if NAFTA passed – they had to know that. In the amoral, only-profits-count world of the multi-national, they didn’t care.
Mr. Gripes wouldn’t be surprised if Mr. Clinton’s vigorous and ultimately successful support for NAFTA did not lead to substantial campaign contributions from the big-pocketed corporations. Bill Clinton, perhaps self-deluded into believing NAFTA would fulfill the promise that free traders constantly preached, was almost certainly seduced by the promise of all that cash. In retrospect, it’s so obvious: NAFTA was a great bonanza for big business; they’ve made out like bandits, and are smiling like Cheshire cats these days.
Once again, big business was able to turn national economic policy towards its own parochial interests, and the country’s working middle class, arguably the very essence of the American economic model, was bloodied big time. These kinds of dumb, destructive decisions are not sustainable for long, even for a once-wealthy country like ours.
Jim Israel
September 13, 2010
